Skip to main content

The Paradox of Orpheus and Eurydice

The story of Orpheus and Eurydice is one told many times in many different ways, and which I most recently experienced in the musical Hadestown.  If you're not aware of the story then there are SPOILERS to come.  

There are different versions of the story but in almost all of them Orpheus is in love with Eurydice and loses her to death, Hades, or some other tragedy, and the loss is often tied to the chance for Orpheus to save her.  In Hadestown, Orpheus has the chance to walk Eurydice out of hell if he can keep doubt away, and not look back to make sure she is following behind him.  If he looks back, though, she must return to Hadestown.  Logically this task seems easy.  

I couldn't help but think about it as a decision matrix:

The Choice:

Eurydice is Following

(loves Orpheus)

Eurydice is Not Following

(it’s all a trick, she doesn’t love him enough to follow)

Orpheus Looks Back

(i.e. let’s Doubt win)

Orpheus fails Eurydice: 

Orpheus loses the deal with Hades, and Eurydice tragically returns to hell even though she did love him

They both failed:

Orpheus loses the deal with Hades, but it doesn’t matter because she wasn’t following anyway

Orpheus Doesn’t Look Back

(i.e. trusts in her love)

They both win:

Orpheus & Eurydice end up together

Eurydice fails Orpheus:

Orpheus demonstrates his trust & love, but it was unfounded & he loses Eurydice anyway

While 3 of the outcomes are tragic (some more than others), the path for Orpheus seems obvious.  the only way he can have a "happy" ending is if he doesn't look back.  SPOILER: Orpheus looks back and Eurydice is following but he loses her to Hades.  This is possibly the most tragic ending because it feels like it was in his control.  I was initially so angry with Orpheus, because not only was the outcome within his control, even it was not in his control, it makes no sense to look.  If you lose Eurydice either way, then there is no reason to look.  You give up your only chance at a happy ending.

So why does he look?  The reason, I think, that he looks is that the fear that Eurydice might fail him and he is duped by it, is greater than the fear that he fails her.  The fear that we are unloved, that we could do everything right, and still the other person might not be there, is somehow more depressing than if we fail and succumb to doubt, because at least we had control over that.  In other words, not having control over the outcome is worse than the outcome being tragic and out of our control.

Orpheus looking back makes no logical sense, but it is true to the human experience.  We often choose failure over letting someone else fail us.  We dump before we might get dumped.  We doubt our own worthiness so much that we'd rather guarantee we're alone than risk being the more vulnerable one.  

I hate this outcome, but I understand it deeply and personally.  I know what it's like to doubt and question repeatedly if someone who says they love me actually loves me.  I distrust their expression if it is not recent and repetitive, because I doubt so strongly my own worthiness of love.  I look back for reassurance out of fear that if I don't keep looking back I'll be left alone.  And I have to ask myself, would I keep doing it if I was told, expressly like Orpheus, that if you keep looking back, if you keep questioning love, then you will eventually lose it.  If you look back again, she'll be lost, even if she was there.  

Logically, the answer is obvious.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why you should watch Star Trek: a letter to my Wife.

Although I am a second generation Star Trek fan (i.e. I grew up watching Star Trek: TNG), I enjoyed the original Star Trek and even most of the later spinoffs. I am also an avid movie fan, and as such could talk for hours about the different themes presented in the many Star Trek movies, both original and TNG. But the creation of the new Star Trek universe by J.J. Abrams presents a problem for me. Is it a gateway by which new fans will be introduced to the Star Trek I love or is it just an action movie to be enjoyed and forgotten? It is both a celebration of the old and a creation of something new to enjoy and a well balanced combination. But part of me fears that the enjoyment of the new characters and CGI action will distract some from realizing why the old Star Trek is worth celebrating. After seeing the new Star Trek with my friends I was disturbed to discover they had not seen The Wrath of Kahn. How could you understand the Kobyashi Maru, or the welling of tears you should feel ...

DVDs are the Best Argument for Electric Cars

So the commercials for the new Nissan Leaf got me thinking about how far away we are from large scale conversion to electric cars (or some version of electric-motor-drive car, such as the hydrogen fuel cell cars we keep hearing about). The arguments in favor are simple. While the internal combustion engine is relatively efficient it cannot be as efficient as large-scale energy generation just because of scale. Although, the power has to come from somewhere, plugging a car into your home outlet would be significantly more efficient (and therefore less polluting) in the long run than running a small-scale power station under your hood. Designing a car around a small (non-explosive) and quieter electric motor also provides infinite possibilities for improvement in safety, aesthetic and spacious design. Contrarians that suggest the technology can't be advanced to the level of internal combustion engines (in terms of distances per charge, torque etc.) are obviously ignorant of the ...